The happy couple are celebrating their six-month anniversary today.
A fabulous shot of the Duchess this evening.
Wherever Meghan goes she always makes every effort to meet well-wishers.
She spent a few minutes shaking hands, thanking people for their kind wishes and receiving gifts for Baby Sussex before entering the Palladium. Jo Wiggins Annand tweeted "My little girl Lucy was honoured to meet Meghan and gave her a gift for the baby."
The Royal Variety Performance takes place every year and is held in aid of the Royal Variety Charity. The money raised from the show helps hundreds of entertainers throughout the UK, who are in need of help and assistance as a result of old age, ill-health, or hard times. In particular, the charity assists former members of the entertainment industry living in Brinsworth House, a residential home in Twickenham, which is owned and run by the charity. It is believed to be one of the few charities in the UK that has an unbroken line of patronage from the reigning monarch since George V in the early twentieth century. Queen Elizabeth II is the current sole life-patron of the charity.
Meghan received a posy that includes foliage from Brinsworth House garden by Darcie-Rae Moyse.
🎠This evening The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are attending the 2018 #RoyalVarietyPerformance at the London Palladium. #Variety4Charity pic.twitter.com/Kw7Npz3TbG— Kensington Palace (@KensingtonRoyal) November 19, 2018
A look at Brinsworth House.
The stage is set.
It has long been tradition for members of the Royal family to make an appearance at the Royal Variety Performance - it dates back all the way to 1912 when the inaugural performance was watched by King George V and Queen Mary. In July 1919, a second royal show was performed. Held at London Coliseum, the show was staged as a 'celebration of peace' and, as the official announcement expressed it, "had been commanded by the King to show his appreciation of the generous manner in which artistes of the variety stage had helped the numerous funds connected with the War". Did you know the event once called for tiaras and jewels? Below, the late Queen Mother in her finery at the performance with the Beatles in 1963.
Her Majesty the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh in 1955.
The Queen Mother met The Supremes in 1968.
In recent times, the Queen has taken it in turns with the Prince of Wales to attend the show. In 2014, the baton was passed down to the younger generation with the Cambridges making their debut at the event followed by Prince Harry in 2015. Tonight marks the first of many occasions Meghan will attend the show.
Rebecca English reports:
'Harry greeted Take That like old friends - and it turns out that they are. Lead singer Gary Barlow told Meghan: 'Ask your husband about playing the tambourine of one of our records!' 'Jamaica wasn't it?' the prince interjected. Barlow later explained that the prince had played percussion on Sing, his Commonwealth record commemorating the Queen's Diamond Jubilee.'
The evening was hosted by Greg Davies and included performances from Take That, George Ezra, Clean Bandit, the cast of ‘Tina, The Tina Turner Musical’, and Andrea and Matteo Bocelli. There was also a performance by the cast of Hamilton. Indeed, Meghan loves the musical so much, she's seen it three times. The couple helped organise a special show in August in support of Harry's charity Sentebale.
There's good footage of the couple meeting performers and taking their seats in the Royal Box in the video below.
There's good footage of the couple meeting performers and taking their seats in the Royal Box in the video below.
A fanfare was sounded before the National Anthem, which was played by the the state trumpeters of the Household Cavalry and the Invictus Games Choir.
More from the Mail Online:
'In the Royal Box the couple smiled broadly as host Greg Davies welcomed them to their first royal variety performance as a couple - which generated a huge round of applause. They also smiled broadly when he also said the entire audience would like to congratulate them on their 'wonderful news'. 'As I believe they say in Royal circle, one is thrilled that two will become three!' He said.
The couple also laughed good-naturedly as they were the subject of Davies' opening skit. He recalled a series of hilarious remarks made by his mother, Pat, 78, a retired school bursar, about the royal family. Their Royal Highnesses will meet a number of performers, as well as Royal Variety Charity and ITV executives, both before and after the show. Meghan laughed and gave a round of applause as he told the audience how his mother had said: 'All of us single ladies were a bit disappointed when he (Harry) got taken. ' 'As if she had a chance!' Davies said.'
After the show, Harry and Meghan met performers backstage.
Meghan caught up with Take That.
The Duchess congratulated Andrea Bocelli on a splendid performance.
The Duchess wore an evening look by Safiyaa this evening. It appears to be a bespoke halterneck top and skirt. The look has garnered a mixed reaction on the blog and social media thus far. It's not my favourite look for the Duchess; I think the band on the top detracts from the embellished detail and it doesn't quite work with fit of the skirt. I could imagine the top worn with a pair of fitted black pants or the fishtail skirt with a shorter shimmering top. I am, however, incredibly excited to see the designer in Meghan's wardrobe and to see more designs from her in the future. Meghan was glowing as always; her hair and make up looked fantastic. Although the look isn't completely winning me over, I do love the sense of glamour it evokes and the fact Meghan is experimenting.
A look at the back.
The look is based on the Malaya Strapless Top. The piece features an asymmetric overlay peplum, all in bicolour leaf sequin.
Meghan's skirt appears to be a custom version of the Gayeta Fishtail Skirt.
The Telegraph writes:
'For Monday evening's glamorous look, the Duchess turned to a new favourite: London label, SAFiYAA, a brand synonymous with elegant red carpet styles. Meghan's outfit comprises of SAFiYAA's Malaya top, a sequinned bustier with an asymmetric peplum hem retailing for £895, but on second glance you'll note it has undergone a few slight tweaks to make it her own. A fine black strap has been added to the bust, creating a seamless halterneck, and a black ribbon has been wrapped around the waist, creating a flattering empire line, a cut often favoured in maternitywear as it neatly skims over a growing bump.
While on the brand's website the bustier is paired with cigarette trousers, Meghan opted for a full-length fishtail skirt which only upped the glamour ante.'
Readers will recall the Duchess chose a beautiful blue cape gown by the designer for the State Dinner in Fiji last month. This is Meghan's best evening look thus far in my opinion.
London based brand Safiyaa was launched by creative director Daniela Karnuts in 2011. With a demanding career in fashion media, she needed a wardrobe that was sophisticated and polished, without being boring or dated. Searching for pieces that were flattering, combinable and travelled well led her to question why a man could go to London’s Savile Row for bespoke suiting yet a woman had to settle on fixed styles and colours. With a selection of 12 dresses and endless ambition, Daniela began her journey to fulfill her needs and those of women with similar desires as well. Named after her daughter, Safiyaa was started from there. The brand is described as "created for women by women".
Meghan wore her Birks Snowstorm earrings.
A closer look at Meghan's pumps.
The Duchess carried the unidentified black textured clutch she debuted for Hamilton.
A very happy six-month anniversary to the Duke and Duchess!
And yet again, more black. Sigh.......
ReplyDeleteI think we have to get used to the fact that she loves this colour lol. Unfortunately, if you want to see colour, Meghan may not be the sartorial person to follow. I am not trying to run you off this page, but the neutral colour palette is her style. Bright colours will be a rarity.
DeleteAnon 19.13 I so agree. Plus everyone is wearing dark colours.
DeleteAnd Harry is in a black tux. It's formal evening-wear, I really don't get the big deal. I feel like Meghan is just constantly, unceasingly nit-picked. If it's not one thing it's another. It's getting old, IMO.
DeletePlus, she wore so many beautiful colors on the tour, so she does wear color. The lovely blue gown, the white gown with the sparkly embellishments on the shoulders, plus the red dress exiting a plane, the striped dress on the beach, and the blue shirtdress come to mind right off the bat. Plus, that gorgeous yellow Brandon Maxwell sheath dress she wore (not on tour, but it popped into my mind).
She looks Great in Black. I'm not sure about the Whole line of the dress ...
DeleteInthekitchen, thank you for saving me from writing your exact words. Its time to let it go...
DeleteI think that, in this outfit, the colour is the least of the problems!
DeleteBlack is welcome if it comes with a nice fitting.
Just because someone has an opinion about her clothes or whatever else doesn’t mean they’re being overly critical or looking for something to nitpick. Commenters suggesting this are being critical of the commenters who enjoy talking about fashion or protocol or Megan in a way that makes me uncomfortable. What is the point of a comment board if every comment on every post is just “oh, I live it, she is perfect and can never ever do anything I don’t totally and automatically completely love.” I am happy to read others opinions on here as they are respectfully worded. Perhaps the people sensitive to any form of critical thinking should consider being the ones to stay off the comment boards. Thank you for all the comments on this event and style -people who like it and people who do not.
DeleteYes! Exactly. Thank you someone finally said. It's a fashion blog we can crtiicize her fahsion without meaning we hate her.
DeleteI simply don't think Meghan is ever going to wear tons and tons of color, engagement after engagement. Black is an elegant choice for evening events and I don't mind her in it, especially after getting some lovely looks on tour. She is, also, still building her royal wardrobe, all while being pregnant -- so that's got to be difficult, I imagine.
DeleteJust to point out (NOT to compare), Kate wears a lot of blue, sometimes several in a row, so perhaps black is Meghan's blue. Just a thought.
First thought...why is she wearing the top to a bathing suit with her skirt? Hoping it makes more sense after more pictures are added.
ReplyDeleteI had the same reaction and am interested to see more pictures. She looks happy and glowing (which is the most important thing), but this dress is a bit of a miss for me. It really reminds me of a tankini swimsuit top... and that has nothing to do with the colors!
DeleteI wish you wouldn't have said that. I can't unsee it now, and I want to see a bathing cap with those plastic flowers on it!
DeleteI just see my mother. I had forgotten about those caps. They came a little later, late fifties, sixties.
DeleteIts called style! Not boring predictability.
DeleteSadly the tankini effect is really awful. It’s a miss this time, for me.
DeleteYes, the top looks like a swim suit. I thought that immediately when I saw back of it. In my opinion it is not a good look on Meghan. I do like the skirt.
DeleteI do not mind at all her choice of same colors. Apparently this is what she likes. I like black, navy, and her white colors.
I love it!
ReplyDeleteMeghan is dazzling! I believe this is the first halter gown we've seen since the royal wedding reception, no? Such fast work Charlotte-thank you!
ReplyDeleteOh goodness the haters are going to have a field day. Bare arms and SHOULDERS. I think she looks fabulous :)
ReplyDeleteShe does. And she is not the first nor the last royal who has arms and shoulders on display:)
DeleteBare arms and shoulders are completely acceptable in the evening. Don’t ask me to explain that idiocincrasy
Delete... And BLACK AGAIN! Love that Meghan remains true to herself and handles “noise” like water off a duck’s back. She looks lovely and elegant as ever.
DeletePlus I actually rarely ever read anything about bare shoulders and arms being an issue in either the press coverage or in the comment sections.
DeleteI think that the bare shoulders are not a problem at all...on a different note, the outfit has a really unpleasant fitting.
DeleteBare arms and shoulders are entirely appropriate for an evening reception of this nature. People have issues with bare arms and shoulders in church or daytime events that are inappropriate.
DeleteI really like her but this is a miss for me. She’s not dressing for her growing shape. realize how hard that is when you’re pregnant but she has every resource at her disposal every designer clamoring to dress her. The gown itself is not only unflattering but it’s way too long (a train at an event where you’re meeting everyone and constantly walking around?) and the gown itself is very outdated looking to me. Extremely open and exposed and does nothing for her figure. She can do better I know she can :-)!
ReplyDeleteI have to agree - this outfit is a miss. Beautiful face though.
DeleteI legit thought someone(Harry?) was stepping on her dress in the side shot. Nope, just the train of the dress.
DeleteThat gorgeous white evening wedding party dress she wore apparently had quite a long train. I assume there was dancing at the party---Father (Charles) and the Bride? First dance of the married couple? I couldn't imagine how she could manipulate a long train for dancing until I remembered the "Belle Epoch" gowns. The tails of the trains had notches or something that attach to bands on the wrist. The photo of the white dress we saw showed her holding the edge of what appeared to be the train in her hand. Maybe she had gathered it up in anticipation of climbing into the car.
DeleteSome above compared the top to a swimsuit top. My mother had a whole swimsuit in the 1940's that looked a lot like that top. Despite that, my first impression was--"How glamourous!" and my second was,"Wowza! That baby is front and center."
Anon do yourself a favour and watch the Scandanavian royals’ first dances. CP Mette-Marit is my favourite, but Mary and Victoria also did an amazing job. I didn’t know it is possible to dance with a train and veil like that.
DeleteI do believe it is a fishtail! A train has different aspects to it.
DeleteI agree that the halter neck and big floral pattern look very dated together. She doesn’t often miss the mark for me, but this is a big miss.
DeletePenny I commented that I thought it needed wider straps or as someone else said strapless, but you have hit a big part of the issue it is the combination of the skinny strap with the big pattern that makes it look like a bathing suit top/tankini. Another thought maybe a wide strap out of the patterned material might have worked better as compared to the skinny black strap, Or maybe actually not a neck strap but two over the shoulder straps.
DeleteI believe this skirt does have a fishtail effect, Granny. The draping starts from higher up whereas I believe a train involves just the hemline being extended. I am trying to remember if there were still bustles during Belle Epoch. I think the fishtail gives a hint of a bustle feel. I an not sure if QOTS read my entire remark or just the "I couldn't imagine" part.I did go on to say I have seen successful dancing with a train--there are some beautiful films featuring that era. The designer information on the white wedding party dress from which Meghan's dress was modeled does describe a "train," I believe."
DeleteIt is black but she makes white look like a color. :) This is really really cute and she looks adorable. Can't wait to see it better. And it's their 6-month anniversary.
ReplyDeleteI agree. The duchess of Sussex is so chic glamour and elegant in black and others colors. She likes black and black loves her.
DeleteAnd she makes the sparkles look like a third color. :)
ReplyDeleteYes, she does)
DeleteIf I say that I think it’s time she should consider maternity clothes does that make me a hater too?
ReplyDeleteHa. Same here. I don't consider myself a "hater," but it seems like a (respectful!) dissenting opinion is taken that way these days. She can--and does--dress better than this.
DeleteShe is not that big yet.
DeleteIt’s not her size. It’s just that her body is changing and non-maternity clothes are extremely unforgiving when a body may change from one day to the next. Fits are often off when a few days before it may have looked great.
DeleteYou are not a hater, that is for sure. I think she will find out soon enough that mat wear is necessary:)
DeleteI am not crazy about this dress. It looks uncomfortable and stiff at the bodice.
DeleteThe halter neck strap looks like an add on. This dress has too many things going on, halter neck, bodice, belt, skirt and the print. I prefer simple Meghan. Sinead
Anon23, I completely agree with you (and I don't think it makes any of us a "hater"). I think she's now reached a stage in her pregnancy where a natural waistline isn't really working anymore and a design with an empire line would probably look better for the next phase. However, it's her first pregnancy and I guess she's still fathoming out what works and what doesn't.
DeleteI think it is time for maternity wear, also and I am definitely not a hater! I think the black stripe across her mid-section is not flattering at all. I am not against bare arms and shoulders, but it did strike me as cold for this time of year. Maybe it is a warm evening in London, but it just snowed this weekend in Colorado, so that was the way it hit me.
DeleteI don't think it makes you a hater. If I were to hazard a guess at why she hasn't switched to maternity clothes, I'd say it was because it must be both surreal and terrifying to have your body change so fast, especially when all of her favorite designers most likely don't make maternity wear.
DeleteThank goodness for this chain! I also think the non-maturity clothes that are so fitted, like this dress or some on the tour, aren’t working. I don’t consider myself a hater.
DeleteNot wild about the dress, but she’s glowing. Pregnancy suits her.
ReplyDeleteYikes. Not a fan of this. It looks like a swimsuit top. Gah, she can do SO much better than this!!
ReplyDeleteThis is a huge miss for me. I don’t like anything about this dress.
ReplyDeleteSharon-USA
I would have loved this one way better: https://www.safiyaa.com/collections/long-dresses/products/tupelo-bicolour-sequin-long-dress
ReplyDeleteYes!! This dress would have been amazing!
DeleteFirst impression - I really like it. Black and white is always a winner in my book and this is the event where it is also very appropriate.
ReplyDeleteWhile it might be in her usual colour sceme it different form anything else she has worn up to now.
Can’t wait for more photos.
I love it too - black and white is always a classic - and very different from her usual. She looks beautiful and I love the narrow skirt and demi-train. I love that she is trying different styles and isn't afraid to take fashion risks. Fashion should be fun, IMO.
DeleteMy only complaint is that I wish she had more "big gun" earrings to choose from. We've seen these snowflake earrings so many times already and I'd love to see her in more jewels. But...that's just me being greedy for diamonds :)
I would guess that might be because of the price. If I remember, I think they cost like $12k. You know the papers will tally up her wardrobe at the end of the year. A 12k piece of jewelry worn 15 times becomes a much better investment than a gift from her ‘taxpayer funded’ husband. Not saying I agree, just what I suspect will be pointed out in the annual wrap up.
DeleteWhile I don't like the cut or pairing of these separates at all, I agree with you that she's switched it up, which is exciting to see! I certainly didn't expect to see Meghan in sequins any time soon. I think she looks glamorous, even if the fit is off.
DeleteKatie, the problem with some of those tallies I have seen with other royal price add-ups is that the costs of repeat items are counted each time an outfit is worn. Each outfit is itemized separately as all new, instead of making the effort to determine which are new items. That adds up and inflates the total.
DeleteThink she looks wonderful and I like this top and skirt styled as maternity wear. The straps do look a bit like bathing suit straps. Think this would have been avoided if they had been wider, 2 inches maybe.
ReplyDeleteI was on the fence with these separates, but your comment on the straps made me realise what my problem really was with them. Thanks!
DeleteOr it was strapless.
DeleteStrapless would've been perfect, I am not sure why she even needed those straps.
DeleteMD Agree strapless would have been lovely, but maybe she needed the straps to make it fit:). She still looked lovely.
DeleteI like it overall, but you're right, the halter top strap could have been wider to match the below-the-bust ribbon and it would have pulled the look together better. I think this sparkly top with the fish-tail skirt is a great look. I disagree with those who were saying it isn't maternity wear. I think she had it redesigned with exactly that purpose in mind. The fit is supposed to outline her shape, not exactly hide it. She's celebrating her body's changes, I feel.
DeleteShe looks amazingly beautiful too. But in the first photos, when she's greeting the crowd, I saw how bundled up they all are and was struck by how cold she could be with the halter top out of doors! But maybe, like many women, pregnancy has made her warmer all the time.
She looks great. Her arms are so toned...nice bag, but wish she would wear strappy sandals sometimes (not a complaint though)
ReplyDeleteLOVE it she looks amazing!!! 90% of the time I am in head to toe black I love that she stays true to her personal color pallet of choice.
ReplyDeleteI don't mind the black and white. I'm undecided on the halter neck. I wonder how far into her pregnancy she is. This time last year W&K attended, and she was 4 months pregnant. Meghan is looking a little further along.
ReplyDeleteDragging on the ground is a huge miss for me; it's so dangerous as anyone, including Meghan, can step on it and cause her to become unbalanced.
ReplyDeleteOooh, miss for me. I like the colors and the pattern but the cut of the top and the bottom seem like a big mismatch for me. Anonymous at 19:02 posted a full dress version of the top with one shoulder and it looks fantastic. Similar to the vibe Meghan has going on, just less awkward looking.
ReplyDeletePositive points from me on fashion - I love the black and white - a most elegant choice. I have no trouble with the bare shoulders - it's a Royal Variety performance, not a state banquet. So I must not be a hater, although I'm sure I've been called one. I like the neat bun too.
ReplyDeleteBiggest positive point. Delighted to see a British based designer - in fact I'm absolutely thrilled to see Safiyaa as a possible go-to designer for Meghan - I liked the blue gown too. A good choice.
Negative quibble - on fashion - The fit doesn't seem the most flattering to me. I'm thinking the belt is part of the trouble. I might have liked it better without that. The flow of the skirt is lovely though.
A cautious positive - So far, I'm not seeing any PDA which all here know has become a sticking point for me - and for many other traditional royal followers. It actually wouldn't bother me here as much as many places, but if it's a sign the couple is taking heed of comments that have been in the press, not just from Julia and her ilk, it's good. If not - well, as I said, I don't think it's a big deal here.
A subtle quibble. Hollywood actresses find a handy camera and give it a big smile. Princesses mostly don't. I'm sure there're exceptions but when the princess was formerly an actress, she needs to be particularly mindful of making that transition.
I disagree with you on the last paragraph. She was an actress yes but what is wrong with acknowledging the media there for a split second. You said many times how car shots are awful, she did not even stop but gave a wave. I just wish we would leave these Hollywood actress thing behind (never happens), at least she knows what it means to work.
DeleteThe press have often complained that Kate and William never give them a good shot, that they ignore the press waiting for them. I don't think acknowledging they are there with a smile and wave is playing to them at all.
DeleteThat's so confusing about not smiling for the cameras because Kate does it quite often (waving even), as does Camilla. Not sure why Meghan would be held to a different standard about what is princessy or not.
DeleteIf one is a 100% traditional royal follower I would say it is 2018! If one wants traditional old fashion princess in manner, dress and speech you are following the wrong princess! This princess is highly relatable and found her prince because she is so.
DeleteWhoa smiling for the cameras is bad? Then I guess HM must be breaking rules bc she finds a camera and gives them a sly smile all the time.
DeleteFrom CrissieP: Respectfully, I doubt very seriously that any mention of handholding in the press has had any effect on the Duke and Duchess. It is completely obvious to me that PH doesn't give one hoot what people think about hand holding with his wife. The fact that they weren't handholding here, likely has to do with nothing more than where they happened to be positioned and their interactions and hand shaking with other guests. IMO, they have never been inappropriate and have conducted themselves respectfully at all times, including solemn occasions. Re the "Hollywood actresses" comment, at least one high profile royal photographer has said that he appreciates acknowledgment via a quick look and wave by the Duchess. Photographers are often waiting for long periods of time, many times in suboptimal conditions, and an acknowledgment is appreciated. Because Duchess Meghan looks at the camera for a second, the tabloids have accused her of being an egomaniac - but maybe she is just courteous and has empathy for the hard working photographers who are paid to get a good shot. Change and evolution can be good - especially when no real missteps are happening. Thank goodness for a little spark.
DeleteNot true, Camilla always looks at the camera as well.
DeleteTo USA Granny
DeleteVery true!
Respectfully, I doubt very seriously that any mention of handholding in the press has had any effect on the Duke and Duchess. It is completely obvious to me that PH doesn't give one hoot what people think about hand holding with his wife. The fact that they weren't handholding here, likely has to do with nothing more than where they happened to be positioned and their interactions and hand shaking with other guests. IMO, they have never been inappropriate and have conducted themselves respectfully at all times, including solemn occasions. Re the "Hollywood actresses" comment, at least one high profile royal photographer has said that he appreciates acknowledgment via a quick look and wave by the Duchess. Photographers are often waiting for long periods of time, many times in suboptimal conditions, and an acknowledgment is appreciated. Because Duchess Meghan looks at the camera for a second, the tabloids have accused her of being an egomaniac - but maybe she is just courteous and has empathy for the hard working photographers who are paid to get a good shot. Change and evolution can be good - especially when no real missteps are happening. Thank goodness for a little spark.
DeleteAnonymous, I do believe you speak for many, thank you. Although I respect opinion, Julia your commentary is truly out of line in more ways then one. It is often important to review commentary prior to pushing the send button. Opinion should be careful not to offend.
DeleteAs an American, I hesitate to judge how the BRF should behave themselves with respect to the camera. I think that the relationship between the BRF and the British public is a complicated one, more so today than in the distant pass. I don't think Meghan is insincere or loving publicity over-much, but then I don't know her and really cannot judge her motives one way or the other. I try to always assume positive intent when I don't know for certain so I believe she is trying to be nice to the photographers by smiling at them.
DeleteI think there are many who feel as Julia does and while I may not agree, I don't think Julia is sexist or judgmental, and actually, being out of touch with the modern world isn't necessarily a bad thing. I wish we could be gentler in our disagreement.
Regarding Meghan's gown, I'm from the maternity wear generation but it's not as commonly worn today except maybe in the last trimester. Kate has been criticized similarly. Meghan is definitely glowing that's for sure and that makes her beautiful.
I disagree with much that Julia has written, but let’s face it - the very notion of royalty and even aristocracy is snobbish at the core. These people are supposed to be “better” than the commoners. Hence all the bowing and curtseying and titles and whatnot. Otherwise, what is the point of them? If they’re like us, then why do they get the titles and a crown? (I say this as a person who believes everyone is equal, but likes to follow royalty. Makes no sense, I know.)
DeleteThere was one princess who almost always looked to the pool of photographers with a shy smile and a wave - Princess Diana. She was known for being kind to photographers, as long as it was on her terms. The poor woman was so hounded by paparazzi her entire adult life, and she learned that giving them the opportunity for one or two good photos meant they would be satisfied and would then leave her alone. Diana knew how to work the press and she did it with aplomb. I think Meghan is simply being herself - she is kind, understands the photographers have a job to do, and is simply throwing them a bone so to speak.
DeleteTrue, aren't all monarchies (as well as other kinds of inherited titles) predicated on the idea that one's birth determines one's value? Not what one has accomplished, but one's birth? First son, all is well. Daughter/second son...hmmm.
DeleteI see what Julia is saying. I think it’s the wave that can make it appear ‘Hollywood’. I would suspect that in reality, it’s more along the lines of ‘we just did a grueling 16 day tour with these guys and I am starting to get to know them and want to help make sure they get what they need’ but a direct smile and wave can come off as ‘Hollywood’. Kate, Sophie, HM will all smile and sometimes wave but it’s a bit more subtle. Meghan will definitely start to understand some of those weird, traditional nuances of being in the BRF(which has, I think, always been more reserved than the European families overall).
DeleteI’m loving the mixed reactions to her dress....I find it hilarious...ahthe life of a Royal...to be dissected day in and day out, to be reduced to how you cross your legs, whether your dress is too high too low to expensive....the incessant speculation and innuendos...fascinating? Comical? Or perhaps peculiar ...
DeleteMeghan and Kate are both “commoners,” marrying Royalty doesn’t change that...their offspring are also children whose mothers and grandparents are “commoners”....and that’s a good thing.
I’m trying to make a simple point..we are all just people,,,each common and royal in our right. All of us..even the BRF....
@Anon23, if this were the era of Marie Antoinette I would agree. Royalty ruled back then. The BRF is something more complicated -- they are not allowed to have any governmental power. Their role has evolved considerably since the days Queen Victoria stayed in mourning for decades. In fact, it's evolved a lot since Queen Elizabeth's coronation. The Queen was perhaps slow to embrace the "modern royalty" but since she's embraced it she has gone all in, so to speak. Today the royal family has to be regal and dignified but they also cannot simply do the royal wave off balconies anymore. They are expected to be more accessible, to champion pet causes, to "give back" to the people, to tour the world as goodwill ambassadors. So in a way every royal has to find his or her niche, to find that balance. I don't think it's appropriate to assign ill will or bad intentions to any royal's action, as Julia has done in this case. Meghan smiles to the cameras -- that's ill intentions? I don't think so.
DeleteJust wanted to say thank you, Julia for expressing both your praise and your concerns as. Having read your comments through the years over at DK and OOS (I am definitely more of a reader than a commentator!), I know you to be a huge supporter of the monarchy, and I know you have a genuine concern for the success of the monarchy. I also know you to have a deep and valid concern that if the monarchy behaves as and becomes viewed as just another group of celebrities, then their uniqueness and usefulness will come to an end.
DeleteI do wish we as a whole were a little less defensive when people offer a differing perspective from our own. In reading Julia’s comment, she tried hard to put her positive views first and state the concerns she had with gentleness. No need to call someone out of line for having a concern. Perhaps I feel that way because I share her concerns.
I, too, was very thankful to see much less PDA at this event. I hope that means they have been advised to tone it down a bit at public, “on-duty” events. While I know many here find all the hand holding, arms entiwined endearing, I find it unprofessional. It is their job to represent the queen and the monarchy at most of these public events, not display to put their affection on display. That is lovely and appropriate in its own time and place, but public duty is neither that time nor that place. (Some spontaneous shows of affection are sweet—its the constant display that seems unprofessional to me)
As far as the greeting of the press goes, there is a balance to be struck. I love William and Catherine, but I think they often fail in this regard. Totally ignoring the press who are gathered there to see you and report on your cause does sometimes seem rude, but the side glance, posing wave that looks directly at the camera does seem a bit forward for a royal as well. There is a balance to be struck, and I think Meghan will find it. She is very early on in her role in the royals family, and she will make many changes as she grows. Many of these things are just growing pains.
Those used to watching celebrity more than royals will see no problem in many of these things. Some used to watching royals will find them refreshing. Some used to watching royals will find them wrong. Each opinion has its own place. And hopefully we can all think about and discuss these perspectives instead of being offended by them.
—T
That a small little wave can elicit a whole conversation, but here is my two cents. I immediately noticed the wave because it is something that Kate never does and lets face it over the past 7 years Kate has been the blue print when it comes to ‘princess’.
DeleteBut doesn’t mean ‘a princess doesn’t...’ just because Kate doesn’t.
There have only really been 3 princesses that had to deal with getting out of a car being bombarded with people shouting and flashed on this level.
Diana dealt with it with a shy glance, sometimes a wave, Kate completely tune the photographers out. This has the advantage of letting her focus completely on the job at hand but it does sometimes make her look unapproachable and gets her a lot of criticism from the media. Meghan will have to figure out what works for her. There is no “the royal way”
Ivy Lin, I wasn’t agreeing at all with Julia saying waving is wrong. Someone else made a comment, now deleted I think, saying she was being snobbish over her attitude about Meghan. I was just saying that while I also disagree with what Julia wrote the whole notion of royalty is snobbish at the root. They truly have a difficult time these days because they are “working” for the people in a way, but are expected to be “better” somehow.
DeleteHi Julia, I'm trying to understand what you mean when you call yourself a "monarchist". Do you believe the BRF should have governmental power? If so, then your concerns might be valid. If the Queen is making decisions that affect the daily lives of people in the UK then they need to act more like diplomats and politicians.
DeleteHowever they have a constitutional monarchy. The BRF has no political power. They are essentially a relic of the past, a way to shore up British designers, goodwill ambassadors for England, a tourist attraction, and that's it. In that context it's inappropriate IMO to expect the BRF to act like people with actual power.
I'll make this a double response.
DeleteAbsolutely not - along with not being drawn into celebrity ways - I want the monarchy firmly out of politics - that is one of the main reasons for its existence - it represents everyone regardless of their politic views and we know how divisive those views can be these days. So when Kate didn't wear black to the BAFTAS - I thought that was the correct decision - which had nothing to do with how I feel about sexual harassment.
So what does being a monarchist mean and what is a monarchy. I see it as having a powerful diplomatic role - one that takes diplomacy out of politics. I see them as representing traditional values and core beliefs of the nation - especially in troubled times whether during wartime or in the difficult moments of today - they can provide a stability, a balm, a continuance - they represent an institution that is ancient. At its best the monarchy takes in account the mood of the nation - if the nation is faced with austerity and the uncertainty of the future - Kate is wise to wear repeats.
I see the monarchy highlighting what is best in the nation - the good works little people do that might not otherwise be recognised and I see them leading the nation in times of sorrow and trouble. I see the institution carefully bringing attention to non-political causes - but there always has to be care. That's the reason Charles - who in the past has been seen as too political - has recently made it clear he plans to stand back from politics when he becomes king. I hope he means it.
I see the monarchy representing Britain - British customs and manners, culture and traditions. Britain is very much a multi-cultural and today a multi-religious nation and the monarchy does need to innovate to bring that - and bring the young in - and yet even the young I believe who support a monarchy (more and more are republican) love the traditional elements of monarchy. So it's worth not throwing those out in an attempt to innovate too swiftly. Innovation can be of the moment and date quickly.
I see the monarchy as an institution that is about how each member fits into it - and each member should think in terms of fitting into it - not redefining it - at least without a great deal of caution and experience and a strong and certain understanding of what being British is. I don't believe it should be a cult of personality. I fell for that myself with Diana and later realised the folly of it - because the monarchy is all about show - the little things - how a uniform is worn - what court etiquette is. We don't and can't know for certain what's happening underneath - who likes who, who does what - we can only make informed judgements but those may not be correct.
DeleteSo what isn't a monarchy. It's not there purely to entertain like celebrities. Celebrities are disposable - they come and go. It's not there for the political causes of the moment because it's survived through many causes that may not have looked so wise in retrospect. And perhaps the point I - and many others - have to deal with, it is by definition an unequal institution. Call that snobbery and you're correct - and I doubt you'd find greater snobs than in the royal household - I've met a couple and it's eye-opening. But the monarchy is never about being equal - we bow and curtsey to the queen -we show deference. There is a rigid hierarchy. To be a monarchist, you have to accept that. I have a number of friends who don't - who feel everyone is equal. They're republicans and that's the reason they want the monarchy abolished.
At it's best, there's a maternal/paternal element to the monarchy - royalists feel we're represented by it and are part of it - why it's nice to have photos of parties - it invites us in. But it's not about individualism. The queen is often said (we never know what she really thinks) to favour Sophie amongst her daughter and granddaughter in laws precisely because she isn't flashy - she doesn't try to stand out. It's almost impossible for the younger princesses to do that - and yet - it's something to remember and strive for - that you're part of a greater family whose goals may not completely align with your goals and yet it's something you must accept and respect. Most of all any member of the royal family - needs to understand what being 'British' is or there is no point.
Why are you all jumping at Julia for her comments all the time? I for one enjoy her comments and am sad to see her comment less because of the vitriol people are throwing at her. The tone on this site, as opposed to the Kate one, is very hostile and unwelcoming. People are pilloried for offering the slightest bit of criticism and referred to as haters. People are allowed to be here and comment, even if they do not wish to praise 100% of the time. It does not mean they hate Meghan or that you need to put down those people immediately.
DeleteI agree with anom 17:52. I find comments like USA granny trying to shut down very thoughtfully worded critiques far more disrespectful than Julia’s post. Please let’s let a discussion happen on the discussion boards!!!
DeleteOk Julia, by that definition you run into the same issues the Hapsburgs did -- that only royalty could marry royalty. If you accept this "special by birthright" concept than there is a very small pool of acceptable people who can join the monarchy and that pool is only getting smaller. Thank god today's princes and princesses do not have to deal with things like "the royal diseases."
DeleteI have to admit I find this concept of inherent inequality very troublesome, and maybe that's why I prefer to view the royal family as places I can look for fashion inspiration, and a bit of an escape from the drudgery of real life. I don't accept that Kate, Meghan, or Sophie are less equal because they were not born to noble blood.
I also don;t accept that to marry into royalty you must denounce/forget your entire past and live entirely to please the royal family. That kind of thinking IMO is outdated and destructive. I would never want Kate to distance herself from her family, or for Meghan to forget her friend Serena Williams or her mother.
So I think we just have different worldviews. Then again, I am American and for the record consider myself politically liberal.
This reminds me of the time Diana, just after she was married, wore a black strapless dress. She was harassed for wearing it. I hope the press and the royals can allow her to break the rules. After all, she is wearing a black dress yo a black tie event. That's not really a social faux pas.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I do think she looks beautiful in colors, and do wish she would wear color more.
But, she isn't "breaking the rules" by wearing black. There is no royal rule about when you're allowed to wear black and when you're forbidden. Kate has worn black many times and it's never a problem so I'm not sure why anyone (the press) would need to create this narrative about Meghan "breaking the rules" or going against "protocol"...when she isn't. It get so tiring after a while.
DeleteHere is Kate in black:
https://www.thecelebritydresses.com/media/catalog/product/b/_/b_kate_middleton_dons_black_lace_cocktail_dress_at_festival_of_remembrance.jpg
https://hips.hearstapps.com/cosmouk.cdnds.net/16/47/1479901178-kate-middleton-black-dress.jpg
https://honnaimg.elwatannews.com/image_archive/original/15671590211490022712.jpg
https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/Duchess-of-Cambridge-526672.jpg
https://www.redcarpet-fashionawards.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Catherine-Duchess-of-Cambridge-In-Diane-von-Furstenberg-Royal-Variety-Performance.jpg
And Camilla:
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/DHTJEJ/camilla-duchess-of-cornwall-leaving-the-government-of-ontario-reception-DHTJEJ.jpg
http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Camilla+Parker+Bowles+Duchess+Cornwall+Visits+EGtwKE_ZK_Jl.jpg
http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Lulu+Guinness+Camilla+Parker+Bowles+Duchess+lHDwSPaEZjsl.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/15/21/4663C09500000578-0-image-m-2_1510780918112.jpg
As a p.s. to my comment above with all the links, here is Charlotte's own Kate blog with a long post of all the black dresses Kate has worn: http://hrhduchesskate.blogspot.com/2015/11/kate-loves-black-dresses.html (and this was from 4 years ago, so probably many more black dresses for Kate since then).
DeleteMy issue is that Kate gets celebrated for wearing and looking lovely in black...while Meghan gets article after article written about how she is ignoring/breaking/not caring about royal protocol (of which there is none) or "breaking the rules." It's really disheartening and unfair and IMO this is why I, and many others, feel so defensive of Meghan. She is being held to a completely different standard and being relentlessly criticized for made up things. For example, the latest garbage in the Daily Fail about how hard Meghan is working...as if working hard is a bad thing?! Whaaa?
inthekitchen...you nailed it on the head. But the real question is why are people so quick to criticize Meghan?
DeleteInthekitchen, YOU make my day!
DeleteInthekitchen, a lot of this is just due to the media desperately looking for clicks. I remember reading those exact same articles about Kate wearing black in her first few years. They were just as rediculous then as they are now. But as time went by the narrative that Kate is changing the monarchy lost traction and the media started to look for other angles to get clicks.
Delete@Theresa J - it's just.so.exhausting. Thank goodness the Sussexes have said they don't read the press about themselves. The comments being posted on the official KP IG pages under Meghan photos are just so insanely unbelievable. I really do hope the Sussexes separate their offices so they can turn off comments when need be and not subject the rest of us to 'racists gone wild' when we're following the Duke and Duchess.
Deleteinthekitchen, I have to say that kate has gotten/gets as much criticism for her clothes and even her parenting. I don't think its just meghan!!
DeleteQueen Elizabeth wore strapless dresses when she was younger.
DeleteBlack is perfectly acceptable for an event like this - if it were a state banquet, it might be another matter. Should Meghan attend the diplomatic reception and because she and Harry seem to be pursuing a link with the Commonwealth, that would make sense - it would probably be best to avoid black.
DeleteOne reason people were so shocked by Diana - besides thinking that wearing strapless made it look like you were sitting in a hip bath as one commentator put it - was she was such a young, fresh girl and in those days young girls, Julia included - tended to wear more vividly coloured gowns - black was seen as appropriate for older sophisticated women.
It wasn't just a royal standard - black as always been acceptable for royals in the evening. (By day it tends to be avoided particularly for formal events because of the link with mourning which is still observed by royalty.)
Julia I’m not quite sure what version of fashion history you are following but the little black dresss was popularized in the Audrey Hepburn era. Pre-dating Diana by 20-30 years. One of the best examples of it coming into style was the Holly Golightly character in Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Certainly a young ingenue type. At least in New York it has never gone out of style since for any age or any time of day. Black is consistently understated chic. I well understand that Meghan isn’t Audrey Hepburn in New York but you have made several assertions throughout this whole post that seem to just support your own interpretations of Meghan’s missteps. It’s growing quite tiresome.
DeleteNot sure whether to laugh or cry here Anon - but the one thing I will say is I would never link Holly Golightly with any royal lady - not Kate, Meghan or Diana or Camilla. Because she is an appealing character but not a respectable one nor meant to be, although Audrey Hepburn certainly was. I wouldn't conflate the two. (The original Capote novella is set in the forties - not the sixties.)
DeleteThe little black dress actually pre-dated Audrey - my mum wore them in the fifties - as a married woman. They go back as cocktail dress to the thirties if not earlier. There's even a book on them with a forward by Darcy Bussell. The queen herself wore a strapless black gown after she was married.
But in the early 1980's in Britain - when Diana wore that black Emmanual gown - it wasn't considered traditional for very young women (she was nineteen) to wear black - especially a very sexy black gown - which is why there were so many eyebrows raised. It wasn't that black wasn't chic for evening. This was probably before your time but styles were different then. It may have been different in Manhattan - probably was. I don't know.
Actually, I was very close to Diana's age and I thought it was wonderful when she wore that dress - although if there had been a blog then, yes, I would have had some quibbles - especially the blue eyeshadow.
By the time Kate wore her black strapless gown at age twenty-nine, not nineteen in 2011, this wasn't an issue and there wasn't any criticism - only praise. She's worn black cocktail dress a number of times since.
I have had absolutely no issue with Meghan wearing black - here or at any other evening event where she has worn black. As I said above, I like the dress she wore here with the exception of the belt and think it's appropriate. Unlike many here and elsewhere, I actually haven't criticised or had issue with Meghan choosing to wear a limited range of colours. I think she looks very good in the colours she's chosen.
Royals don't normally wear black for some official daytime events for a completely different reason. Unlike for many - they still observe black as a mourning colour. Wearing it for daytime makes that more ambiguous. You might say it's saved for certain occasion when it is the only appropriate choice for a royal such as Remembrance.
Younger royal ladies including Kate, Meghan and Sophie wear black in the daytime on individual engagements but when the queen is present and most royal ladies are not wearing black - it isn't the best choice.
I consider myself a royalist - following Diana, I made the decision, I'd observe all royals with a critical eye - praising where there is good (such as Meghan with the cookbook) but offering a critique when I see something that could be changed. It seems to lead to false allegations here - so I will stand back as I mostly have anyway - but as I've often said on the Kate side where I've often been critical too, offering only praise is like inflated grades - in the end, it means nothing.
Capote thought Marilyn Monroe would more properly capture H.Golightly than A. Hepburn in the film. Yes, AH wore Givenchy in the film but the resemblance between her character and the royal ladies is nil to me.
DeleteThe top does remind me of a bathing suit (as others have also said.) I am wondering if this top is altered/bespoke with the straps and black band added. It looks just like the strapless top on the designer's website so far as I can tell. https://www.safiyaa.com/collections/tops/products/malaya-strapless-top
ReplyDeletePerhaps she had to order up a size to fit her pregnant body and needed security from straps? This designer doesn't really seem to do halter designs that I can see.
I certainly didn't think "bathing suit" first, though I see why a comparison might be made. I like the top, like the black skirt but it is not improved by a train and dragging the ground. Looks awkward as she moves. Her makeup is subtle and lovely tonight.
ReplyDeleteThis is genuinely hideous. The thin halter screams 2001 as does the silhouette. I love Meghan, but this is probably one of the ugliest things she’s ever worn.
ReplyDeleteYes!! I was trying to put into words why I didn’t like the halter. Early 2000s for sure. Love Meghan. But what is with these outfits. She obviously has style as shown by outfits she’s worn in the past.
DeleteI love this outfit! To me, it looks youthful and flattering. This is actually separates; the top is glittery and very pretty in videos of the event. Mid-pregnancy is hard to dress for. I think the Duchess is nailing it.
ReplyDeleteMeghan is seen talking to a young girl when they arrived. What a thrill that must be for that child! Very thoughtful on Meghan's part.
This Dress dosent look good AT all. I really love her modern style but this is a miss for me. This Dress does nothing for her
ReplyDeleteI like it. Not going to try to get into an argument with anyone. She bent her knees to accept flowers from a sweet young girl who was selected to offer them, and I saw nothing but graciousness and grace. I generally love a fishtail skirt, but I recognize that others' mileage may vary. Thanks, Charlotte!
ReplyDeleteI know that she is a neutral kind of girl, but I'm really getting bored with all the Navy, Cream, White, Black and Tan. She's a beautiful woman that looks great in color. This gown is definitely a miss for me....
ReplyDeleteI like the dress. The Duchess of Sussex is having fun with fashion, and it shows. The Duchess of Sussex is bold, beautiful, and brave! Parthenia
ReplyDeleteWell she looks like she is positively glowing and healthy so that is wonderful.
ReplyDeleteThis outfit is cartoonish to me and I am at a loss as how to make it better. Not her best choice.
Wow, very underwhelmed sadly. So sick of her being in black - again and again and again. Like aspects to the shape, however, I feel that the top does nothing for her.
ReplyDeleteWell..I like the black and white combination and I like her neat updo without hair on her face, but unfortunately the dress is Meghan’s biggest fashion-mistake up to date. Really hideous.
ReplyDeleteFour months ago these separates would have looked lovely on Meghan. The top - ? - should be coming away from her hips slightly like in the photo on the site and of course no strap would be necessary. And it appears that she ordered the Gayeta Fishtail Skirt skirt in black (shown in blue on the site). Which I'm ok with - I assume her wedding reception had a train and she managed it at the event so she probably has some skills here.
ReplyDeleteBecause it had to go empire it's throwing the top off slightly. The one shoulder dress has a photo with the belt and it works.
I do like her hair tonight and she looks happy and healthy. She and Harry have certainly had a lot of evening events recently. Hopefully Megan is able to wear these gowns at the Christmas festivities at Sandringham.
I love the black and white. I would have liked it as a strapless. I find the spaghetti straps coupled with the band under her bust line to be visually conflicting or shall I say distracting. Had it been a simple strapless without the band for my taste it would have given the dress a beautiful fluid line from head to toe. The dress is stylish but has been over customized rather then left simple.
ReplyDeleteMegan looks absolutely radiant in this fabulous outfit! I adore it! I think it's a very lovely, creative way to dress for this time in her pregnancy. The top is gorgeous. It suits her really well. The long skirt creates a lovely silhouette. This is a big win for me.
ReplyDeleteR
I don’t wanna stir the pot, I really like Meghan, but good Lord if this isn’t a great miss I don’t know what else could be.
ReplyDeleteShe has the double task of finding her style within the rules of the RF and at the same time she has to adjust constantly to her changing body...I wish she had someone to advise her on the fashion choices lately.
Very nice make-up and updo!
ReplyDeleteThe dress, on the other hand, is a huge miss..that bodice seems so stiff and uncomfortable, the fitting is really very unflattering and I’m not a fan of the trail.
So the pictures do not change my first impression. I find it very disheartening that they take the time to meet well-wishers and is greater with a wall of cell phones held by people who are more interested in a photo or video than actually speaking to them or shaking their hand. I find it very disrespectful...
ReplyDeleteI agree. Princess Anne complained bitterly and rather sarcastically about those camera phones. Unfortunately, these days if there isn't a photo, it didn't happen. It seems the emphasis has gone from "I witnessed this" to "I did this." Not celebrating the royal so much as making it all about oneself being somehow a player.
DeleteNot sure if I said this clearly.
I don’t care for a version of yet another black dress. I’d love to see more color in her evening dresses.
ReplyDeleteEek love Meghan but this is a big miss. First of all I agree... it's time for maternity wear or at least looser waistlines. Her body is changing fast. The other thing is that for a black dress there is so much fussiness. The third thing is that it just fits awkwardly. And finally once I saw the bathing suit I couldn't unsee it. I think the material doesn't help. For an expensive gown it looks rather cheap. Like a Target prom dress.
ReplyDeleteSadly, this outfit is a miss for me.
ReplyDeleteThe dress of Meghan is more sensational when I look at videos. The dress is glittering and I like the brightness of sequins in the night light. But to part all this, Meghan has a crazy natural charm, an she is so glamorous and as raises it Charlotte, the duchess has a make-up and a magnificent face. The skin is magnificent. It is a future radiant mom. The pregnancy makes her shine even more.
ReplyDeleteNo a fan of the dress. I had a bathing suit with a similar pattern, but she is positively glowing and no one is going to love everything she wears! We all have off days. I'm thankful no one can see me today. I think this would have been better suited for her before her pregnancy -- maybe.
ReplyDeleteHope from USA
I didn't see the bathing suit until someone mentioned it, and, like others have said, now I can't unsee it! Before that, I kind of liked what she was wearing. It looks like she has some sort of glitter on her arms and shoulders. Or maybe it's just the lighting. It looks nice.
ReplyDeleteMeghan is only six months in the royal life and she is doing perfectly!Great work,and if we don' t like her outfits or her hairstyle sometimes,we must accept she tries hard and she looks gorgeous,interactive,friendly,natural.
ReplyDeleteThanks again Charlotte:)
Agreed. She appears to be taking well to royal life, and certainly is glowing.
DeleteBefore I get attacked for daring to give anything but a glowing report, let it be known I said the same about Kate several times during her pregnancies.
ReplyDeleteMeghan needs maternity wear. This fits her so badly. This trend of wearing regular clothes as maternity is rather silly. There HAS to be maternity formal wear.
This look is a fail. Black is boring, the halter top looks cheap, and the top doesn’t fit her properly.
Nobody wears maternity wear these days, not younger women anyway.
DeleteI wore maternity wear. Infinitely more comfortable and clearly not wearing it results in an ill fitting gown. And I’m hardly old.
DeleteBut MD today's maternity clothes aren't the tents of Diana's time or the smock tops from the era of "I Love Lucy." Trying to "adapt" non-maternity clothes to an ever-changing pregnant body is likely to result in more misses than hits. What fit last week may not fit next week. Maternity clothes are designed to be more flexible and today's designs can do that without being sack-like. And if a pregnant woman, no matter her age, is frequently in situations where she needs to dress professionally, wearing regular clothes often doesn't work out too well. At home, in a very casual attire work situation, or in non-work private situations, anything goes and that's fine. Meghan is already having designer clothes altered for her because of her pregnancy, after all. Designer maternity is likely to be a better investment. It's not as though "sized up & somewhat altered" non-maternity clothes will work for her post-pregnancy anyway.
DeleteNo one is saying Meghan has to wear those ghastly bib-smocks that women in the 50s wore. Maternity wear today is a matter of looser stretchier fabrics and different fits. Meghan is like a ton of small-boned, short-waisted women who show early and whose figure changes radically with pregnancy. Wearing fitted non-maternity wear just looks awkward now. It's also a good investment for when she recovers after birth. Looser clothes will be a blessing when she's nursing and still working off the baby weight.
DeleteI think her tight black pants are probably maternity and some dresses will be maternity as well, however nothing is wrong with this outfit, it fits her pretty well, minus the straps.
DeleteOne word: seraphine.
DeleteIt was a life saver in my pregnancy and much like Meghan I have a shorter torso with longer legs by proportion.
I'm pleasantly surprised at all the engagements Meghan has been attending: I had expected her to retire for a few weeks and only make a handful of appearances after the tour. It's such a breath of fresh air 😊😊😊
I love classic black and white and I’m not tired of seeing it on Meghan but daaaaaaaang - what is this?? This is the first time she’s had such a whopping MISS that it almost makes me laugh out loud. Kate has had a few very very memorable ones as well, so I guess Meghan can be welcomed to the club!
ReplyDeleteCould this dress be what she wore to the PoW birthday party? Maybe the neck strap has been added for this occasion? I think Meghan looks lovely very but I wish the designer didn't add the black waist band I think that distracts from the lovely pattern of the top, I'd love to see her wearing it with black pants one day.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure this is what Meghan wore to Charles's party. I've seen only one picture where the top of her outfit could be seen (the photo taken from Harry's side of the car) and it looks like there is some sort of white trim sticking up in the middle. This top has black trimming all the way around as does the original design it came from. I do agree it looks like she wore B&W to that gathering but I don't think it was this top.
DeleteYes i think that she wore in prince of of wales party I think the duchess meghan looks great in that sess these look was good for her she can wear whatever she wants ... She's been learning some point
ReplyDeleteMaternity wear---remember in "I Love Lucy"? The more I see this, including her always gorgeous side views and the video, the more I like it. The "mermaid" tail is fun yet rather elegant, and she looks adorable tucked into those sequins. She never fails to be beautiful in black and/or white, as much as I'd like to see her in turquoise or rose. I think she's really enjoying having a baby to cradle. Such a happy and cheerful spirit.
ReplyDeleteI admire Meghan so much, I think she is inspiring, strong and beautiful. And she is doing amazing in her new role but I have to say that her sense of style sometime is quite disappointing. Of course she doesn’t need to please anyone besides herself but I don’t really understand some of her choices. This one specially has a really bad fitting. It looks very tight and uncomfortable. She is stunning regardless.
ReplyDeleteJulia, Meghan is used to posing for the camera. It will take her a while to get the hang of it. That being said, I really do not see what is wrong with looking friendly and engaged in what you're doing. I think likeability does go a long way. Diana would have withered on the vine if she had to go by your standards. She basked in people's affection!
ReplyDeleteBringing Sofia of Sweden into this makes bluhares see red. Apparently you don't remember any of our other conversations. I don't have much time for slut shaming and not allowing people to learn and grow. Sofia has been a lovely addition to the Swedish royal family and her wedding is only second to Harry and Meghan's in my eyes.
And I have seen a video of Kate at Harewood House seeing the Tour riders off where she's so obviously posing for photographers Kim Kardashian would be impressed.
My point, you ask? Couldn't disagree with you more if I tried.
I'll just say bluhare that if a man had the same background as Sofia - I would have equal questions about him. (And there are men that would fit.) We make choices in life. Like you, I'd never fault anyone for what they can't help - but what career path you choose with your life is a choice.
DeleteAs for Kate at Harewood - you'd have to give me a link for what photograph you mean. I took a quick look at images - and don't see one that fits what you described but there are a lot of photos out there of that event.
Yes, it takes time to get the royal hang of things but a huge part of that is knowing you need to get the hang of it. That's what I've sometimes have found lacking. Making criticism here is difficult - more so it feels to me than it was with Kate - where you - and I - were often quite critical. That's why many people with nuanced views have turned away. I was called a hater on the other side more than once but I don't hate anyone - I look only for how they are fitting - or not fitting - into the royal family.
This is a very small issue - but I think if small issues don't get addressed, they aren't solved until they turn into big ones - and you do no one a favour by pretending they don't exist. I saw that with Sarah, Duchess of York. I'd like to not see it happen again. For me, it's better to speak openly than to do what I'm seeing in the press - making veiled critical remarks under the guise of praise. But we can agree to disagree there too.
So did you have issues with Mette Marit too? She had a Past as well. I do not like this tone at all, Julia. Redemption should not be an alien concept.
DeleteWhat I saw of Kate was a video of Kate posing for cameras.
And I don't think Meghan has any issue to worry about. She's not gawping at everyone and playing the clown like Sarah Ferguson. In fact, I think Meghan's presented as quite dignified.
This outfit is confused. It looks like the baby is sitting rather high and the black band that is trying to give her an empire waist is just not high enough. I also think it is too thick. The halter strap looks like someone tacked it on as she was walking out the door. The top would have looked spectacular a few months ago, but it just isn't working now that she has filled out a little bit.
ReplyDeleteMy biggest issue with the skirt is the material. In pictures it looks like the stretchy material that DVF and Issa dresses are made out of, and it just doesn't go with the top. Someone mentioned that the designer styled this with cigarette pants, and that would have been a homerun, however not appropriate for this event.
She does look so happy and the glow is amazing. She should bottle it up and wear it every day.
The skirt reminds me a little of Morticia, but her makeup is gorgeous, and I don't mind the top!
ReplyDeleteThe Duchess of Sussex definitely has that pregnant glow thing going. She looks healthy, simply fantastic. She is NOT breaking any protocol by wearing black and all that “Duchess slant” stuff is also NOT protocol. Wearing off the shoulder and showing the back is also NOT breaking protocol. Princess Eugenie had her back showing at her wedding and, at least twice, the Duchess of Cambridge has worn two beautiful floor length gowns with a high cut up the thigh. Also, at this same charity affair, the Duchess of Cambridge has worn an off the shoulder gown (I believe it had maybe flowers on top of a black or dark blue backing). If the Duchess of Sussex was breaking rules and being rebellious, the Queen, or the powers that be, would have put the Duchess in ‘check’ by now. The media spins stories to get attention and views but their reports are not accurately based on statements from the Queen or those who speak on her behalf. Tonight, in my opinion, the Duchess of Sussex wore a dress that she obviously likes. I, personally, would not purchase the dress for myself but I FULLY SUPPORT, in this regard, the FREEDOM OF CHOICE. From that perspective, I say more power to the Duchess of Sussex. Charlotte, thanks for the info on the production. I know I would have enjoyed it. Andrea Bocelli is one of my favorites and Hamilton is still being performed because it is ‘simply that good’. Great “throw back” pictures showing the Queen and Queen Mother in tiaras. The Queen Mother meeting the Supremes and the Queen meeting the Beatles; awesome pieces of history. Thank you, Charlotte for your research and for sharing.
ReplyDeleteAlso, by watching the video, the Duchess of Sussex did NOT spend a lot of time shaking hands. She got out of the vehicle on the side where a little girl had a gift for Baby Sussex; the little girl called for her to come. The Duchess simply went over and received the gift, gave thanks, handed the gift to her attendant as the Duke of Sussex waited for her. It was endearing and a nice gesture that the little girl will remember fondly. Thanks, Charlotte for the video.
ReplyDeleteEmily, cigarette pants would look great with this top. I have not looked at the skirt very closely but what you are saying makes sense as to why the whole (along with other issues) does not quite work.
ReplyDeleteThe Prince of Wales and his family are accepting of the Duchess of Sussex (Meghan). I think the bigger question is why do people who DO NOT KNOW Meghan, pre-judge (prejudice) her? I know the answer, but self examination is necessary for corrective behavior. Thank you, Charlotte.
ReplyDeleteOn reading the comments, it's rather funny that the top reminds many of a bathing suit and then he shirt is called mermaid or fishtail! Maybe she's playing with us.
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering if she wore this top at Prince Charles' party---without the straps. It would match the little bit of sparkle that we could see in the car ride.
Speaking of needing more diamond earrings, I haven't seen her rewear her wedding bracelet or her reception earrings.
ReplyDeleteI know. I loved those and I hope we see them again.
DeleteHere I am... odd man out... again! I'm one of the complainers about how much black Meghan wears but I liked this outfit - a lot. I did think, with the first photo, that I was going to see pants, but being 'black tie' a skirt is more appropriate I suppose. I do think it would have benefited from a straight skirt (ditch the train). I also agree with another poster that the one shoulder dress looked better. Playing with my "paper dolls" I put the one shoulder over Meghan's photo, still as a top, hiding the black band, and it really did look so much better. The halter straps are too thin and look like an afterthought. The black band also would look better placed directly under her bust instead of just above her waist, but better still eliminate it all together.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to see some new earrings. There must be a pair in the vault HM would loan her. Queen Victoria's pearl drops come to mind.:) And surely some of Diana's lovely jewels are still around. I'm really surprised that we haven't seen Meghan and Kate being gifted some of these sparkly treasures.
I think the band was placed where it was to cover the horizontal seam. On the model it looks like the seam is at the waist with the peblum flaring out below. Obviously that seam/band placement won't stay at the waist on a pregnant figure. While I agree the band would look better empire height, so many horizontal elements (seam and separate band and "neckline") probably wouldn't have worked. Better not to have the band at all from what I can see. (But maybe the band helps keep the top from riding up?)
DeleteI liked the outfit! Different but elegant. I thought she looked great.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the comments about Meghan looking directly into the camera at times and posing. I have read several comments from Royal Reporters these last months with regards to Meghan. They very much appreciate her acknowledging them at functions as she walks in, and even briefly pausing so that they can get a good shot. It is their livelihood and they appreciate her thoughtfulness, something that Kat and William reportedly never do, and even go out of their way to make photos difficult. Not criticizing, people, so don’t leap down my throat. Simply pointing out facts. I highly doubt that Meghan is being narcissistic, she comes from Hollywood, a world where actors and reporters and media all work together....
ReplyDeleteAlthough it is not my favorite look of hers, it has grown on me. As everyone mentioned Meghan's glow is lovely to see. She looks so happy! On the topic of Meghan always looking engaged for the camera - I like to think it comes to the time she spent as an actress and growing up on set. I think she still has respect for cameras and the work people behind cameras (on official duty of course) do. I don't think thats a bad thing. Besides if she didn't the press would tear her apart for giving off a high & mighty/better than you air.
ReplyDeleteMeghan is criticized relentlessly and primarily because she isn't British aristocrat and there is a tinge of racism I pray she can withstanding this stress during her pregnancy
ReplyDeleteNot true at all. She is simply subject to the same scrutiny and criticism that Kate was and is, because of who she is married to. Nothing more and nothing less. but that's a lot of criticism and scrutiny. Everything she does wears and says is analysed.
DeleteThere isn't anything racist about it. Yes, there are awful and vile people on the internet that say terrible things. But I don't think that's anyone that regularly follows this blog. We aren't racist, we just don't like her outfit.
DeleteAs a white person, I don't like to think I've picked up a racist attitude, and I would greatly appreciate it if women of color who post would let me or others know if something said could be construed that way, rather than a blanket statement. I wonder if it was me, if I said something offensive and I hope I didn't!
DeleteEmily, I looked back at the photos and I think the band was meant to be at empire height but rode down lower. It should have been tacked into place at the empire level. Can not imagine they meant it to go 3/4th of the way across her bump, ie with 1/4 of her bump bulging above the band and 3/4 below the band. So I have to assume it rode lower during the wearing of the gown and that it was not permanently fastened to the right spot on the dress.I agree with all your comments:), but have commented along the way. I think you observations are right on and I had just not focused on some of these details.
ReplyDeleteStill looking at the top and it looks like the waist seam was not adjusted to an empire seam so it appears the band does go over the seam but maybe originally the band was supposed to lie above the seam but on it to make it appear more empire style? Whatever it may have worked much better in person than some of the photos and I still think she looked great and I like the look.
DeleteI like her...but this is a big no for me.
ReplyDeleteHuge miss!!!! I sometimes don’t understand her choices!!! I follow her because I follow Kate and i absolutely love some of her separates, purses and jewelry... to die for, but I sometimes am baffled. This just is so weird for pregnancy, unlike in Oceania, she finally has a stomach that is really popping enough to grasp, so why not embrace maternity!!! I couldn’t wait to start wearing it because things started to feel uncomfortable early and i took a while to really show too! I’m not saying wear a tent, but the body conscious styles and empire waists and gathered sides that are out flatter SO much more and feel so much better. I have a very similar build to her, but having anything tight like that on a growing tummy and widening hips and also ribcage looks extremely uncomfortable and it’s actually the opposite of giving a flattering line. Thinking back to when I was pregnant about 3 years ago, I couldn’t fathom shoving myself into that! It looks so stiff. Granted, my boring self had nowhere glamorous to go, but I digress.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I am so so so jealous of her skin since I had the opposite of pregnancy glow. My son caused me to break out in the worst possible way. I’m guessing it was the extra testosterone, so putting it out now she is having a girl. She and Kate both look glowing when pregnant.
And this isn’t a take on her character, it’s a fashion blog and her fashion choices and fit of clothes is sometimes confusing to me.
I love Meghan but cant stand this outfit but oh well her face is beautiful and she looks happy and has a healthy baby in her tummy !
ReplyDeletethanks Charlotte for a good post.
I love this outfit. The material of the bodice is rich and heavy, the texture and pattern lovely, the flowing skirt just beautiful. I think the dress has a 90’a feel, and it’s time we bring that fashion back, it’s been 20 years! It’s a 10/10 from me.
ReplyDeleteYou know I am surprised by my own reaction to this dress. I found myself in agreement in majority of the posters here and did not like it at all, but as I kept viewing more pictures and videos I found the look growing on me and I actually started to like it. I usually find this to be the case for many of her "daring" choices I would say. I do believe a good reason for this may be because we are not used to seeing this style of clothing before and so it catches us by surprise, but later on find ourselves liking it as we get used to seeing it. But perhaps this may only apply to me.
ReplyDeleteI agree. My first thought was that it was a rare miss, but as more photos came in, I found myself quite liking it.
DeleteI actually like this outfit, but not for fall. I couldn't help, but think, "She must be cold."
ReplyDeleteI also knew that this outfit would prove controversial, and I was right. I don't think there is royal protocol for dressing, and frankly, I'm tired of reading that Meghan is breaking it. People have made up in their minds that she's some royal rebel, but I think it boils down to cultural differences and personal tastes.
I totally agree with you with the cultural differences. As a North American myself, I can say that we don't easily go for bright colors (except during summer and even there we go for pastels). Just love Meghan's choice of wardrobe.
DeleteThis made me smile. I couldn't help wondering whether a light shawl might have been a good choice - until I saw that it was fully sequined. I have, unfortunately, worn a fully sequined top... once. It was the hottest garment I'd ever put on!
DeleteI love this outfit, she looks nice and charming. I would have liked a cap because I'm always cold and she gives me chills with all that bare skin in November but that's me lol
ReplyDeleteSilvia
I quite like the look. And I love how Meghan's face is starting to look a bit different in pregnancy! At the moment, I'd say the baby is a girl... but I was never good at this kind of guessing! 😜
ReplyDeleteShe looks lovely! Black & White is always elegant. I watched the videos the top has a beautiful sparkle when the light hits it. Fits her perfectly, and she looks quite comfortable walking and kneeling down to speak to the darling girl who gave her the bouquet. They are a good looking couple!
ReplyDeleteI love Meghan, but this outfit is awful. The skirt is too long, dragging in the street. The halter top makes her shape look square. Kathy from NJ
ReplyDeleteI really don't understand this "skirt is too long" comment. What about wedding dresses? Nobody cares if those are dragging on the street?
DeleteWow. This is a hard no for me. The print is awful. The halter top is unflattering. The skirt is dated. Definitely a rare misstep for Meghan here.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I loved the look, although I've read all kinds of comments. One of the funniest relies on the "reported" complaint made to Meghan by no less than HRM about dressing too "Hollywood." All my fellow long-time royal watchers may remember photos from this event in 1999... when HRM wore the sequined harlequin dress by Hermes?
ReplyDeleteI love that Meghan is showing options for expectant women who share her body type. She has (in her own words in an interview about the styles of clothing she chooses) a "short torso." This affects how she carries her child. Instead of having the extra torso length for the baby to flip top to bottom when he/she moves (like in longer-torso women), the baby most frequently moves from side to side and/or back to front, making her look wider or more popped out than other women might, at the same stage of the pregnancy.
(Sorry for the tangent, but as a mom of 4 daughters and MIL of 3 beautiful women, all of whom at some point struggled with maternity clothing options, it's a pleasure to see a body-confident woman wearing a range of styles.)
Thanks for the lovely blog post with so much of the history and meaning behind this event.
Sequins strikes me as a bit of a departure for Meghan, but I think it looks festive. I think the top is beautiful, and goes over her bump, so a good length for someone who is pregnant. I don't think the black band was meant to be a belt, but something to emphasize the empire line at the top. It seemed lower in some pictures, so perhaps wasn't sewn on?
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I like the fishtail skirt, but it had elegant swish as she walked. I think there might be stretch in the material, making it more comfortable for for a growing pregnancy. Both top and bottom could be easily be worn again, together, or separately, so good value for money. I get the swimsuit comment, but I don't think swimsuit when I see it. I think the top gives it a bit of an 80's vibe. That doesn't make it good or bad, just an observation. She is not far enough along to go full-fledged maternity evening gown like Kate did in Norway last year. I think this outfit was a good choice for a red carpet at her stage in the pregnancy. She looked beautiful as always. On another topic, I once heard a royal photographer say that they appreciated Meghan giving them a direct shot, which other royals don't. I see it as a gracious gesture to the press, and I don't see anything unprincess about. Royals need the press these days and acting like they don't exist is not necessarily more gracious or royal.
Wow! Really dissapointed by the “you don’t like the dress you’re racist!” And “you should get off the blog!” Kind of comments. That kind of childish fighting is getting old. I thought we were a community that could politely agree to disagree while we follow the Duchess
ReplyDeleteI've been tempted to stop reading the comments for this very reason. :-/
Delete-AZ
@ Anonymous 15:48. I agree. That is my preference, to discuss intelligently without offending. I offer comments on both blogs but I’m just not too critical but I realize the pressures these ladies endure to go public and get critical reviews for making personal choices. I know it is the life they’ve chosen but I tend to go soft because it is easier to critique than it is to be them. I’m not offended by anything that has been said but will respond intelligently to comments that I think could be looked at from another perspective or point of view. Everyone enjoy your blessed day.
ReplyDeleteI do agree with Charlotte - had she done pants instead of a skirt - amazing! But I do like this look over all - and it was nice to see them out and about looking so dashing. I wonder if she's due in late March early April.
ReplyDeleteCharlotte very kindly allows comments to her blog. She created this blog to allow us to follow along with her as she so diligently and wonderfully covers the activities of THR the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
ReplyDeletePlease, out of respect for Charlotte, if you want to comment, fine. But please don't engage with someone if you can't do it respectfully.
Glad to see Meghan trying new things (read: sequins!), but this look is a very big miss for me. Like others have said, the swimsuit top is unflattering and the pairing of these separates is just odd -- it doesn't fit right.
ReplyDeleteI can't imagine how frightening it must be to have your body changing faster than you can buy clothes for it. I'm hoping Meghan will start to turn towards some cute maternity brands.
As always, I thought Meghan looked lovely. The sequined top was beautiful, though I would have liked it better without the black band around the middle and the halter. I think it would have looked better entirely strapless. Whether the band was meant to be a belt or an empire waist, I'm not sure, but I think it would have been better without or at least more obviously an empire waist. Perhaps a light black shawl would have been nice too. I'm always afraid people are so cold when they were strapless gowns! Hahaha. Nevertheless, it was a pretty choice and she looked great. And I LOVE her Birks Snowstorm earrings. I'm glad she wears them so often.
ReplyDeleteBtw, her blue cape dress was also long, at least the cape was on the ground. What is the big deal?
ReplyDeleteWell this is a really ugly outfit. Wrong choices all over.
ReplyDeleteBut I hope people won’t get on the fence for this..it’s not a comment on the person, is a comment on her fashion choices (which are a very small part of her doing!); I feel that nowadays everyone that don’t cover Meghan with compliments is seen like a hater and IMO this behavior fuels the hate-narrative in the first place. Very disheartening.
Silly me thought this was a blog about the fashion of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex...I’m not sure how talking about her clothing choices makes anyone racist if you don’t like something. Saying you don’t like her shirt or wishing she would wear more color is not a personal attack on her...it’s discussing fashion. On a fashion blog.
ReplyDelete