tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post4358505119181823941..comments2024-03-24T00:23:36.772+00:00Comments on Mad About Meghan: The Duchess Sends Message of Support Marking Grenfell Anniversary & Plans for the Coming MonthsAdminhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11799152261801421558noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-26729178179818950472020-07-06T22:48:30.781+01:002020-07-06T22:48:30.781+01:00Optics is not code for people's own opinions, ...Optics is not code for people's own opinions, but its context is as it relates to public perception. Definition: "(typically in a political context) the way in which an event or course of action is perceived by the public." Whether fans of Meghan want to believe it or not, there is a perception that they are buttering their bread on both sides and that just gets pretty messy. They can certainly use their titles, but again, why should they? To be credible with their intent to become "respected charitable figures" with influence, then they need to separate out their new role. The 'perception' is that they are cashing in on their royal titles and status, which makes one wonder if that was their allure to begin with. PS I am in PR and don't think this has been handled in the best manner, especially for the money I am sure is being paid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-27903882259877696722020-07-03T19:04:12.781+01:002020-07-03T19:04:12.781+01:00Please. The word optics is just code for people’s ...Please. The word optics is just code for people’s own opinions. Everyone fancies themselves a pr or legal expert when I doubt anyone on these comment threads really is. Why shouldn’t they use their titles? They stepped down from an active role but they didn’t lose their titles and names. It’s their right to use them as they see fit, they’re really under no obligation to satisfy internet commenters concerns about “optics” Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-50075641854595285332020-07-03T19:01:38.672+01:002020-07-03T19:01:38.672+01:00They do not want to be the royal family of America...They do not want to be the royal family of America come on. Where does this opinion even come from. The whole concept of a royal family is really not very American. We have famous families but they range from the Kennedy’s to the Kardashians. There’s no class structure with the RF on top like there Is on the UK. And old moneyed family is essentially treated the same as a low brow reality tv family. That’s all people would see M and H as if they tried to sell an image of America’s royal family. Rather I think they’re working towards being respected charitable figures with influence in the donation/causes sphere. And that’s fine. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-60853516947238558712020-06-27T23:14:17.169+01:002020-06-27T23:14:17.169+01:00No one here is saying they aren't worthy repre...No one here is saying they aren't worthy representatives or asking Harry to step down from the succession, although there is precedent for him to do that. Most people agree they are ideal for their public role. Harry was the most popular member of the family and Meghan has contributed her intelligent enthusiasm since they got together.<br /> It is all about what they do - in fact what they can or can't do, while representing the Queen and the Palace has a wariness about commercial involvement. Remember that the Wessex duo got very bad publicity when attempting to maintain their business involvements. They were continually in the headlines for that and Edward was very unpopular. <br /> Harry's cousins Peter and Zara have no titles because Anne chose not to accept them and they have no royal duties probably for the same reason. This does free them to accept commercial sponsorships including being paid by magazines for their wedding photographs. It is obvious that the Queen is selecting from the pool of her nearest relations for Royal duties and it is not an automatic process dependent on your place in the succession. You can get also get demoted like Andrew has. If you are outside this inner circle and have no duties you can freely accept sponsorships and go online without the close scrutiny of the Palace. Harry and Meghan could do that. <br />However there are some difficult choices to make, If they are signed up with a commercial agency, will their present charities have to negotiate through that firm to arrange any future activities? <br /> A Kiwi Fannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-52560741449652944452020-06-26T17:49:54.509+01:002020-06-26T17:49:54.509+01:00Wasn't a criticism, it was an opinion about wh...Wasn't a criticism, it was an opinion about what I thought they should do. It was their objective to establish a 'branding' that would give them a separate and specific identity, even while they were within the RF. My comment was more geared to that, again, while they are still royal, with titles, they are NOT REPRESENTING the RF and that has been made clear to them and to us. I don't know what they are 'entitled' to use under the agreement, but my suggestion was that it would be good to immediately start trying to define their separate platform line that line rather than blurring it by reminding everybody they are royal. Of course,Harry will always be royal and you can't take that away, BUT it's the optics, and that's the point, its what it looks like when they do it, like they are flip flopping. The Press won't move on until they (the Sussexes) are laser focused, as right now it all gives the appearance of being very vague and convenient. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-42511160162531625952020-06-26T14:52:39.537+01:002020-06-26T14:52:39.537+01:00100000% anon 19.29. They want to be their own RF, ...100000% anon 19.29. They want to be their own RF, the RF of America. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-79467954420293459462020-06-26T02:41:45.574+01:002020-06-26T02:41:45.574+01:00People will find any little thing to criticize thi...People will find any little thing to criticize this couple. I wouldn’t question their use of the monogram. They are still members of the royal family, and their personal monogram is not a logo of the royal “firm”, so to speak. Harry is still the sun of the heir to the throne and a royal duke. It seems they will go by their titles. Harry said to call him Harry, not Mr. Mountbatten Windsor, and if he were to go by a surname, I imagine it would be Harry Sussex.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-30463662804048865412020-06-26T01:01:29.003+01:002020-06-26T01:01:29.003+01:00About the letterhead, they are still royal. They a...About the letterhead, they are still royal. They are members of the Royal Family. They are a duke and duchess. Harry is line to the throne. This is a special company because you have to be born into it to be apart of it; he can't undo his birth. Press won't move on until they are laser focused on the next generation. <br /><br />It's not what you do; it's who you are, or, here, who you are married to. Harry's cousins are paid sponsors of products/companies, getting a divorce, etc, but the press is now focused on pretending that Meghan really did do something horrible at a garden party based on a book to come out. Why isn't there a rebuttal about this from the RF? <br /><br />Watching some earlier videos of Meghan, I had forgotten how determined and well spoken she is. It must have been so hard for her to try to keep herself quiet. I'm glad she is free again.Allison in USnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-15307376106907403042020-06-25T19:29:48.332+01:002020-06-25T19:29:48.332+01:00"People can make up all kinds of fantastical ..."People can make up all kinds of fantastical tales as if they know things. That’s the disinformation process." Those 'fantastical tales' abound on both sides, i.e. "'run out' of the UK, there are are forces determined to keep her gone".....how in the world does anyone know this for a certainty. There are all levels of fans and followers of H & M and all have their own opinion. Not all differing opinions are 'haters'. My opinion aligns with Anon 21:49. While I don't begrudge them their wealth (i.e. Meghan's from her work, and Harry from his mother's inheritance), they are no longer representing the royal family officially and therefore to be taken seriously they should not accept any money from the Duchey, that's where I think the disfavor they may feel from some people in the middle comes from. That is my opinion to which I am entitled. I do not hate them, but rather hope that they are as altruistic to their endeavors as they claim, and that they are successful in their charity endeavor, and that can only be proven over time. In light of the recent news of them signing with a known company to be speakers, I have a big problem with speakers making boat loads of money while promoting charities, it feels very disingenuous. Especially when I know personally, people whose sole purpose is to make life better for others, their efforts truly selfless, and they do not profit monetarily as a result. I know of organizations that donate shoes, books, food, and they have volunteers come out to package the trailers to be shipped to countries in need. The job gets done without a speaker, without a celebrity to promote the charity, and without any monies being paid out to promote the charity. There are some truly wonderful people in this world who don't get the credit they deserve, but then that's not what they are seeking. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-81493500782497783992020-06-24T21:43:37.508+01:002020-06-24T21:43:37.508+01:00It's not a crime, but it's about optics. ...It's not a crime, but it's about optics. If Harry and Meghan just want to be H & M, then use letterhead to that effect. When you leave a company and you are clear that you no longer want to be a part of that institution (i.e. royal), than you don't continue to use the company letterhead (i.e. no crowns). I get that the thank you is tied to Britain and that they still have royal titles, BUT their PR should advise them to come up with some other form of identifying moniker for them to use, absent crowns. The first rule to silence your critics is to take away the criticism.....note to self 'don't use crown letterhead'. Yesterday's participation of Harry and Meghan at Homeboy's Industries is what they should be doing; rolling up their sleeves and becoming involved without all the hoopla. That's what they said they wanted to do and Tuesday's efforts are what they need to continue to do. They have told the world that this is what they are about, and this type of action, the 'doing' is showing that is truly who they are. More of that and the press will move on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-30066462098766400572020-06-24T21:08:35.168+01:002020-06-24T21:08:35.168+01:00Anon 17:46 I feel that now that Meghan has been &...Anon 17:46 I feel that now that Meghan has been "run out" of the UK, there are forces determined to keep her gone. And to keep her out of the RF, although of course she will always be a part of the RF.Allison in USnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-58154096934469264362020-06-24T17:46:53.918+01:002020-06-24T17:46:53.918+01:00Allison
So true. I love Harry and Meghan .why so ...Allison <br />So true. I love Harry and Meghan .why so many people said the fake news of them?<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-44587698546722978152020-06-24T06:08:47.009+01:002020-06-24T06:08:47.009+01:00Yes a huge loss.
Royal 👑 WatcherYes a huge loss. <br />Royal 👑 WatcherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-83715303145314413382020-06-23T22:20:56.105+01:002020-06-23T22:20:56.105+01:00bluhare, I agree. I am still so blown away by the ...bluhare, I agree. I am still so blown away by the cookbook. I think Meghan opened up the range of RF activities to some extent. Allison in USnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-86804436444878121592020-06-22T22:57:27.754+01:002020-06-22T22:57:27.754+01:00Everything about Harry and Meghan is becoming a cr...Everything about Harry and Meghan is becoming a crime. <br />Harry rest one Prince.<br /> What's the problème with this paper ?<br />They have signed Harry and Meghan. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-72826640858603867412020-06-22T22:38:24.801+01:002020-06-22T22:38:24.801+01:00Exactily !
I agree with your comment.
There's...Exactily !<br />I agree with your comment. <br />There's no rush !<br />Harry and Meghan are not fools.<br />I have every confidence .They ' re going be successful.<br />Good luck Harry and Meghan. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-25369595913014135232020-06-22T21:06:49.726+01:002020-06-22T21:06:49.726+01:00It seems like they can't please anyone. Wow --...It seems like they can't please anyone. Wow -- there is only one British RF, only one heir, and he has two children. Harry cannot melt into the background. I know he would like to -- I'm sure he yearns to be a regular person whom no one recognizes. Meghan has every right to pursue a political office -- when did this become something evil or immoral?? I don't know if the drones, for example, are "merely" for photo purposes or something more dangerous. There's so much we don't know. Meghan just seems to irritate the heck out of a lot of the wrong people. :) I just enjoy whatever they doAllison in USnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-8494773933676328592020-06-22T20:53:37.995+01:002020-06-22T20:53:37.995+01:00Anon 15.31 the problem is the narrative. For the t...Anon 15.31 the problem is the narrative. For the third time, why officially saying they’ve decided to postpone the launch when the actual story is they have been forced to do it because of paperwork problems? They’re saying it was their idea when it was not an idea but a legal problem. <br />They can take all the time they need or simply never launch it and do their things without a foundation. But their statement was simply not true. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-81589817000669709772020-06-22T16:46:29.958+01:002020-06-22T16:46:29.958+01:00Ordinary people face great challenges in the pande...Ordinary people face great challenges in the pandemic. The American economy is in tatters. I very much doubt that The Sussexes are going to struggle. They are personally wealthy and don't need to work to keep a roof over their heads. I also doubt that Meghan has political ambitions, though she clearly wants to be a force for societal change. The harsh comments about them on this blog are nothing to the media attacks that would follow if she decided to pursue a political career. Right you are, Felix. greybirdkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12794736268830548767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-6026699914153486972020-06-22T15:31:28.620+01:002020-06-22T15:31:28.620+01:00Anon 16:36, nobody said they couldn't roll the...Anon 16:36, nobody said they couldn't roll their support of the BLM movement into their Archwell project. Paper work delay or bureaucracy problems, its still the same problems. Their charity needs to be less value and this could work to their advantage because it gives them time to really think about how to structure it. Also, there are claims that they have switched attorneys and that could cause yet another delay. Better to take your time and do it right than rush to get something out there that doesn't meet the needs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-23907507791140649372020-06-22T11:17:07.726+01:002020-06-22T11:17:07.726+01:00Look at this, Charlotte:
https://www.dailymail.c...Look at this, Charlotte: <br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8446409/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-send-letter-thanks.htmlGabyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16854246126829174780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-16065898387018420262020-06-21T21:49:16.067+01:002020-06-21T21:49:16.067+01:00@Felix: fair enough. But why did they not just cut...@Felix: fair enough. But why did they not just cut the financial ties with the BRF then? This remains their biggest weakness in terms of being taken serious. Just because your parents have this or that job doesn’t entitle you to be basically live on the tax payers purse. The wealth of the BRF didn’t come from them being gifted business people. They accumulated it through inheritance and grew it from there. That’s some privilege we are talking about here. The Dutchies that are seen as „private income” are still tied to their royal titles and don’t truly belong to them personally. That’s why the BRF and their spending is watched closely and they get a bad round in the press every couple of years. If they have multi millions they can easily afford housing and security as well as travelling and setting up what ever businesses/charities they like. They don’t carry out royal duties anymore and so there is no need for money that they didn’t earn or inherited on their own. It just looks really unfortunate to be still taking a check from PC. It hurts their reputation and in that case I cannot defend them. If they cannot fund their life with their own money they are definitely not financially sound in my opinion. Being painted as struggling is still better than being branded grifters. Their brand is hurting massively at the moment and I hope they make some smart decisions so that the trial period can still turn out very successful for them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-15464628588215707472020-06-21T17:21:01.544+01:002020-06-21T17:21:01.544+01:00The british tabloïds are obsessed by Meghan and Ha...The british tabloïds are obsessed by Meghan and Harry. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-23632471754096856212020-06-20T23:03:40.545+01:002020-06-20T23:03:40.545+01:00Funny how a positive post about a project that has...Funny how a positive post about a project that has taken off and is now expanding should be good news and a place to rally around. <br /><br />Alas, we can’t have that. <br /><br />Felix, the tabloids and the commenters here don’t know how much money they have or don’t have or their cost of living. People like to bring up these matters up, as in Meghan’s political ambition even if she doesn’t have any, or their charities, including non existent ones , because it’s a place to launch criticisms from. People can make up all kinds of fantastical tales as if they know things. That’s the disinformation process.<br /><br />If Harry and Meghan were successful, they’l be branded as gold diggers. If they receive security support from Charles, then they are spongers. It wouldn’t matter what they do. Even poor Archie gets the labels. He’ll never be good enough. <br /><br />The tabloids need their usual pet subjects to make angels and devils from. The world is in the toilet so the tabloids chose to distract people with gossips and lies because for some people, hate fuels them to awful action.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-523822918879524553.post-16103092314011881222020-06-20T17:21:04.067+01:002020-06-20T17:21:04.067+01:00Meghan is a multi-millionaire from acting, modelli...Meghan is a multi-millionaire from acting, modelling, fashionista, blogger. She has multi-million dollar investment portfolios and receives royalties from her 8 films and 23 TV shows. her wealth is grossly underestimated. Plus, Harry inherited millions from his mother, great-grandmother and probably will receive inheritance from his father. Meghan is super-intelligent and knows the world of finance because she is a businesswoman. Their decision to be financially self-sufficient was not made from emotions but made from sound judgement and their collective wealth. Meghan has always been a low-maintenance person. In her TIG, she said her most extravagant item was a $3,000 watch. Janina Gavankar said that Harry and Meghan can be happy without the need for too much wealth. The fact that they can make personal and large donations is proof that they are financially sound. They can live happily from Meghan's wealth or Harry's wealth alone. Don't listen to the tabloids they are trying to brainwashed the public into thinking that they are struggling.Felixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14053508553244242008noreply@blogger.com